12399456https://www.upal.com.my/zh/feeds/jobFeedKwongwahArray ( [0] => HTTP/1.1 200 OK [1] => Date: Wed, 09 Jul 2025 11:08:24 GMT [2] => Content-Type: text/xml; charset=utf-8 [3] => Connection: close [4] => Server: cloudflare [5] => Nel: {"report_to":"cf-nel","success_fraction":0.0,"max_age":604800} [6] => Vary: Accept-Encoding [7] => X-Powered-By: PHP/7.4.33 [8] => Cache-Control: no-cache, private [9] => X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN [10] => X-Xss-Protection: 1; mode=block [11] => X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff [12] => Referrer-Policy: no-referrer-when-downgrade [13] => Report-To: {"group":"cf-nel","max_age":604800,"endpoints":[{"url":"https://a.nel.cloudflare.com/report/v4?s=byd2Tk9ozysX9iXiRyLgS3pGhNTjW2UxtQZk19nLg2O5PZsR6dqlC0ORwcdlNZhbtOzXV1OiDwAGEKN2U%2BLgOl7HJY4PQ1NO7dB52Xg%3D"}]} [14] => Cf-Cache-Status: DYNAMIC [15] => Server-Timing: cfCacheStatus;desc="DYNAMIC" [16] => Server-Timing: cfEdge;dur=3,cfOrigin;dur=7 [17] => Set-Cookie: UpalLiveSession=eyJpdiI6IkFzNkprNlh4QWt6QzlMcERjY1pSQmc9PSIsInZhbHVlIjoiM1pwVFVYK0JndDFvbE81VkdNcWRFSThscUp6OVI4S1FNWjU2R004YmNhbDBYU3BNYkVXMktDXC9DeTNnRVlLaTJ1dEk4c3V6a2c3RXgzcjhMXC8wQzZqQT09IiwibWFjIjoiYzcyOGE0NDhhODliN2NkNGQzMzVjODRhOWYzNTU2MmM5Mjg0MDkyNWQ5ZjM4MWMxNWQwMDdiNGY4ZDY4NzE4MiJ9; HttpOnly; Path=/; Max-Age=94608000; Expires=Sat, 08 Jul 2028 10:32:51 GMT [18] => CF-RAY: 95c75cfd1a833dc7-KUL [19] => alt-svc: h3=":443"; ma=86400 ) 789

尽管吉隆坡高庭早前承认《国安法令》禁保释乃是违宪，唯周三审理淡米尔之虎案被告之一，即甲州牙力州议员沙米纳登的案件时，仍驳回其保外候审的申请。

法官阿末沙里尔今日（29日）在庭上，驳回沙米的保释申请。

此前，阿末沙里尔认同另一高庭法官纳兹兰的裁决，指国安法令禁止保释的规定违宪，并认为，涉嫌恐怖主义的国安法令扣留者仍然有权申请保释。

沙米纳登也是甲州行政议员，他因为卷入淡米尔之虎案件，遭警方援引《国安法令》扣留，随后在去年11月与另11名嫌犯分别被控。

沙米虽否认有罪，惟法庭不允准他保释。

去年11月，法官纳兹兰裁决《国安法令》禁止保释的规定，即该法令第13条文因篡夺法庭批准保释的权利而无效。

《国安法令》第13条文阐明，禁止法庭允准恐怖主义嫌犯获得保释。

不过，纳兹兰当时裁定，这项规定违反司法、立法和行政三权分立原则，同时也谕令地庭审理沙米纳登的保释申请，案件随后移至高庭审理。

---

// // // //