12399456https://www.upal.com.my/zh/feeds/jobFeedKwongwahArray ( [0] => HTTP/1.1 200 OK [1] => Date: Tue, 01 Jul 2025 12:26:38 GMT [2] => Content-Type: text/xml; charset=utf-8 [3] => Connection: close [4] => CF-RAY: 9585e4949bf86e6b-KUL [5] => Vary: Accept-Encoding [6] => X-Powered-By: PHP/7.4.33 [7] => Cache-Control: no-cache, private [8] => Set-Cookie: UpalLiveSession=eyJpdiI6IlBHd3hPSnp3dzI1XC9DVXNWMGEwaTVRPT0iLCJ2YWx1ZSI6IkVcL0s3TnpCd2hPMFltRnJzYUtLQWVJQmhicDJPd1U1XC90MUFDMXVvbWpJVlZ6MHdIWWtWcVBaQUZKN2l0Yjc3NGM1RktHR3NcL3RDaDFVTzl6RmlIOHp3PT0iLCJtYWMiOiI1MjM3NGNkYjYyZDIwNDlkYWRiYTQxM2Q3NTBjNTEzNzJhYzI1ODM5ODBlZDNhZmE5NjMxNjUyMDMxNzhhZjg4In0%3D; expires=Fri, 30-Jun-2028 12:00:00 GMT; Max-Age=94608000; path=/; HttpOnly [9] => X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN [10] => X-XSS-Protection: 1; mode=block [11] => X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff [12] => Referrer-Policy: no-referrer-when-downgrade [13] => cf-cache-status: DYNAMIC [14] => Report-To: {"endpoints":[{"url":"https:\/\/a.nel.cloudflare.com\/report\/v4?s=1IWHE2z07Da9JmqKd0Vr5vptGqUmqQucpiFrrFEjg6mswGur6fKoYv5qDyEkJtBKwqoA5FxwSOL%2FRclNcL9tNs0Ptle%2FSngMq5WnIwErS%2Fx4R0etAsIs1RBNcyyNXqkgx%2F8%3D"}],"group":"cf-nel","max_age":604800} [15] => NEL: {"success_fraction":0,"report_to":"cf-nel","max_age":604800} [16] => Server: cloudflare [17] => alt-svc: h3=":443"; ma=86400 [18] => server-timing: cfL4;desc="?proto=TCP&rtt=862&min_rtt=848&rtt_var=267&sent=4&recv=6&lost=0&retrans=0&sent_bytes=3000&recv_bytes=756&delivery_rate=3383177&cwnd=253&unsent_bytes=0&cid=4b4bedbe60bb5ee7&ts=39&x=0" ) 789

尽管吉隆坡高庭早前承认《国安法令》禁保释乃是违宪，唯周三审理淡米尔之虎案被告之一，即甲州牙力州议员沙米纳登的案件时，仍驳回其保外候审的申请。

法官阿末沙里尔今日（29日）在庭上，驳回沙米的保释申请。

此前，阿末沙里尔认同另一高庭法官纳兹兰的裁决，指国安法令禁止保释的规定违宪，并认为，涉嫌恐怖主义的国安法令扣留者仍然有权申请保释。

沙米纳登也是甲州行政议员，他因为卷入淡米尔之虎案件，遭警方援引《国安法令》扣留，随后在去年11月与另11名嫌犯分别被控。

沙米虽否认有罪，惟法庭不允准他保释。

去年11月，法官纳兹兰裁决《国安法令》禁止保释的规定，即该法令第13条文因篡夺法庭批准保释的权利而无效。

《国安法令》第13条文阐明，禁止法庭允准恐怖主义嫌犯获得保释。

不过，纳兹兰当时裁定，这项规定违反司法、立法和行政三权分立原则，同时也谕令地庭审理沙米纳登的保释申请，案件随后移至高庭审理。

---

// // // //