12399456https://www.upal.com.my/zh/feeds/jobFeedKwongwahArray ( [0] => HTTP/1.1 200 OK [1] => Date: Wed, 05 Feb 2025 04:54:13 GMT [2] => Content-Type: text/xml; charset=utf-8 [3] => Connection: close [4] => Vary: Accept-Encoding [5] => X-Powered-By: PHP/7.4.33 [6] => Cache-Control: no-cache, private [7] => Set-Cookie: UpalLiveSession=eyJpdiI6Ik80NHRXbjhCaDVyVFo1NTkzbVpzYmc9PSIsInZhbHVlIjoiZFJnSGpsOHMzcWNpaVdYVWY0aTg4MlFrQXRucHIrZXhZRkJNczQzSHVnNGJ3a0tSY3Z4cHR1UXg2aGJRWDRPaFJJR2pYdjB6U1RDdGNTZk5UT0FkUlE9PSIsIm1hYyI6IjQ3MzIzMjAzZDhiZGRiNTE4NWViNzkwOGM4Y2I0MWI5OTdjMGE4YTRhZDFlMmFiZDg1ZmQ3YTFkMGJkMzRhNGIifQ%3D%3D; expires=Sat, 05-Feb-2028 04:54:13 GMT; Max-Age=94608000; path=/; HttpOnly [8] => X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN [9] => X-XSS-Protection: 1; mode=block [10] => X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff [11] => Referrer-Policy: no-referrer-when-downgrade [12] => cf-cache-status: DYNAMIC [13] => Report-To: {"endpoints":[{"url":"https:\/\/a.nel.cloudflare.com\/report\/v4?s=O9XXp9KIQmQ%2FdEYrt5DCqIW1cu4Lx3zVZTjD6WLrPvRoacQFUy05VkYwObY0ZbJs828xFYLPnmAqX9%2BDQi5D8zDJ9uA30so9LwORw6QHBy7zZNhkJ4mGpohLD4MiKydRSt4%3D"}],"group":"cf-nel","max_age":604800} [14] => NEL: {"success_fraction":0,"report_to":"cf-nel","max_age":604800} [15] => Server: cloudflare [16] => CF-RAY: 90d04d196c4628f7-LAX [17] => alt-svc: h3=":443"; ma=86400 [18] => server-timing: cfL4;desc="?proto=TCP&rtt=196381&min_rtt=196318&rtt_var=55282&sent=5&recv=6&lost=0&retrans=0&sent_bytes=2995&recv_bytes=756&delivery_rate=14751&cwnd=33&unsent_bytes=0&cid=84ba84a22ddcf6ce&ts=1045&x=0" ) 789

尽管吉隆坡高庭早前承认《国安法令》禁保释乃是违宪，唯周三审理淡米尔之虎案被告之一，即甲州牙力州议员沙米纳登的案件时，仍驳回其保外候审的申请。

法官阿末沙里尔今日（29日）在庭上，驳回沙米的保释申请。

此前，阿末沙里尔认同另一高庭法官纳兹兰的裁决，指国安法令禁止保释的规定违宪，并认为，涉嫌恐怖主义的国安法令扣留者仍然有权申请保释。

沙米纳登也是甲州行政议员，他因为卷入淡米尔之虎案件，遭警方援引《国安法令》扣留，随后在去年11月与另11名嫌犯分别被控。

沙米虽否认有罪，惟法庭不允准他保释。

去年11月，法官纳兹兰裁决《国安法令》禁止保释的规定，即该法令第13条文因篡夺法庭批准保释的权利而无效。

《国安法令》第13条文阐明，禁止法庭允准恐怖主义嫌犯获得保释。

不过，纳兹兰当时裁定，这项规定违反司法、立法和行政三权分立原则，同时也谕令地庭审理沙米纳登的保释申请，案件随后移至高庭审理。

---

// // // //